|
Prohibition of adoption in Registered Partnership Act is unconstitutional
[ 20.7.2009, Martina Štěpánková
Rovné příležitosti > Trh práce
]
Government Council for
Human Rights approved initiative of its Committee for sexual minorities on June
18, 2009 which is directed at abrogation of Section 13, paragraph 2 of Act No.
115/2006 Coll., on Registered Partnership as amended, according to which “Lasting
partnership prevents any of partners to become an adoptive parent”. Suggestion of the Committee for sexual
minorities derived from Analysis of Czech legal regulations for
adoption of a child by gays, lesbian and bisexual people in the light of the
European Union law and European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms processed for Gender Studies, o.p.s. by JUDr. Mgr. Janem
Wintrem, Ph.D. (hereinafter referred to as “Analysis”).
In accordance with the Act
No. 94/1963 Coll., on Family, as amended, anybody who can guarantee by his/her
way of life that adoption will be for child’s and society’s welfare can become
an adoptive parent. Act on family thus enables anybody having a proper life
regardless of their sexual orientation to apply for adoption. It is necessary
to emphasize that it is an individual adoption when a child is adopted by an
individual who becomes a mother or a father of a child. If a person applying
for individual adoption is married, he/she also needs his/her wife’s/husband’s
approval pursuant to section 66 paragraph 2 of Act on Family. Joint adoption of
a child - when both married partners
become parents according to law - is according to Section 66 paragraph 1 of Act
on Family reserved only to husband and wife, an unmarried couple thus cannot
adopt a child. A couple of the same sex cannot under any conditions jointly
adopt a child according to Czech legal regulations – not as unregistered but
also even not as registered. Moreover, the person entering
registered partnership cannot adopt a child individually as an individual,
since entering registered partnership is an absolute obstruction for adoption.
Registered partnership in the Czech Republic is intended only for couples of the
same sex; as follows not only from law but also from explanatory report to this
act according to which “ legal form of registered partnership is
exclusively intended for homosexual couples of the same sex”. Gays and
lesbians can adopt a child individually, but at the moment when they enter
registered partnership, they are utterly denied this possibility. The analysis at stake examined the question
of accordance of adoption ban pursuant to Section 13, paragraph 2 of Act on
Registered Partnership with European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms and the Constitution of the Czech Republic. European
Convention underlies the right to freedom of interference with private and
family life under Article 8 and under Article 14 freedom from discrimination. The
interpretation of these articles got a new dimension following the ruling of
the European Court
for Human Rights in E.B. v. France
of 2008. Ms. E.B. was a teacher having a long-term relationship with another
woman having been denied to adopt a child. The denial was based on the lack of
paternal referent and lack of commitment of partner to adoption. Ms. E.B. appealed
to European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “ECtHR”) where
Grand Chamber decided. According to Analysis “The court derived from
argumentation of criticized rulings - often referring to the homosexuality of
claimer - that the homosexuality of the claimer had been a decisive reason for
denial of her application. Examining the absence of male referent is legitimate
for application but in rulings for adoption authorization by an individual this
aspect was, according to ECtHR, emphasized excessively. The Grand Chamber of
ECtHR held that there had been violation of Article 14 of Convention freedom
from discrimination and Article 8 of Convention, i.e. the right to respect
family and private life. French authorities had treated claimer differently due
to her sexual orientation without stating convincing and valid reasons
justifying the different treatment.”
For evaluating adoption
denial in Act on registered partnership, this verdict is of cardinal
importance. It follows from the conclusions of analysis that “Following
the European Court of Human Rights verdict on E.B. v. France of January 2008, which
newly interpreted Article 14
in connection to Article 8 of European Convention on
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the provision of section 13 paragraph 2
of Act on registered partnership according to which a registered partner may
not adopt a child is in apparent contradiction with European Convention and Constitution
of the Czech Republic since it represents forbidden discrimination on the
basis of sexual orientation in relation to right to family and private life. European
Convention is part of Constitution of the Czech Republic and thus sufficient
reason for abrogation of section 13 paragraph 2 of Act on Registered Partnership
by Constitutional court for its discordance with constitution.”
Whole analysis is available
at: http://www.feminismus.cz/download/analyza_adopce_final.pdf
The analysis
was funded by OSF Praha foundation.
|